Category: Blog Posts

Artists Guide: Making a Living as an Artist

Being an artist looks fun and glamorous, but the average painter, sculptor, and performance artist rarely get to live those eccentric lives we’re used to seeing on media outlets – or at least, most of them.

Sure, fine artists who show their work regularly in established galleries are more likely to earn more. They are established artists, so their work is recognized and highly valuable. Yet, that’s nothing but the tip of the iceberg as far as the kind of work and earnings other artists do.

Artists typically earn their living within four ways: commissioning works, selling finished pieces physically and online, teaching, or taking visual artist gigs for commercial studios.

Artists have also been made icons of poverty and struggling for centuries. But this is often not the reality of the situation… While starving or excessive wealth is considerably romanticized, people often make an adequate living out of the arts.

But let’s go back to the beginning of it all. Before earning an income, what does it take to make a living as an artist?

The Arts Industry

Let’s start with an introduction to the Arts Industry. The arts are not only valuable in and of themselves, but they also play a key part in countries economic success.

Take New York City or London for example, – the cultural capitals of the world. Arts and the Cultural Sector can have a great economic impact via expenditures and receipts from various activities. Like Broadway, Off-Broadway theatre productions, museums and art galleries, auction houses, shows and so on.

It’s a very profitable growing industry that attracts millions and can be linked to the Entertainment Industry, Technology and Tourism. By promoting the creation of new work posts, new businesses’ and constantly adapting to society’s needs, this industry is well adapted and there’s always space for new and upcoming artists.

Unless you want in on the rich and glamorous bit of it like Koons or Hirst… It might be harder to make a living like that then. Believe me, it’s not from lack of trying…!

Education

Although artists may be exceptionally talented without formal education, most visual artists tend to pursue a secondary education.

Most artist’s academic journeys often include a Bachelor of Fine Arts (BFA) or Master of Fine Arts (MFA) degree from an art school that is accredited by National Associations or Schools of Art and Design.

For art majors, being critiqued is part of their studies. Having feedback from peers or professors that still practice what they teach will get a prospective artist ahead. Art students also study art history and fundamental techniques of various creative practices, giving them an advantage, – regarding their knowledge of multidisciplinary skills.

Usually, the Universities and Art Schools provide great opportunities to show prospective collectors or future employers student’s work, by typically doing a degree show, a presentation of a student’s latest project, organizing talks and conferences, exhibition events, or by simply showcasing their portfolio.

Experience

What most people don’t know is that most artists have parallel jobs while making art. And that’s actually very beneficial. While taking in other job activities, artists can also gain other skills that are always favourable for future gigs.

Artists income can increase with each level of experience. Exposure and a diverse set of skills and settings make the artist more desirable and interesting to potential clients. It can also make you ready to take on different job positions, – related to your practices of course.

So, if you’re not making it as a full-time artist yet you can also consider starting a career as something else…

A background in visual arts may lead to jobs such as museum technician, conservator or art director, – a position that entails supervising other artists. Their salaries range from $47.35 per hour for those self-employed with five years of experience or more. Not bad, right?

Growth Trend

According to the BLS (The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics), job demand for visual artists is expected to grow by a modest 1% between now and 2029. An estimated 300 new creative job positions will be created in addition to vacancies from retirements and job changes.

However, when the economy reaches a lower point, it will probably be more difficult for freelance artists to sell their work because potential buyers may have less disposable income.

Types of Artists

To pursue a career in the arts as nothing but an artist, there are various occupations you might want to consider.

With the right education, volunteer work, internships, and and art major, artists can find success in a variety of disciplines.

Fine arts, crafts, digital art, illustration and multimedia to name a few vocations. They’re all different types of visual arts. Ones more prestigious than others, but they’re all subcategories that fall under the Artist umbrella.

Traditional Artists

Traditional artists specialize in the design and making of handmade objects. These are typically sold to the general public through commissions, shops, online or dedicated craft fairs. However, established craft artists might have work showcased in museums and art galleries.

The role of a traditional/ craft artist is to produce original handmade works from a variety of materials, including glass, paper, fabric, metal, ceramics and wood. Perfect for those who like to create things by hand.

Illustrators

Illustrations can be the pictures used in magazines, books, calendars, and so on. This area is great for those who like to work with a wide range of styles, whether to create work for a fantasy novel, a diagram in a medical text or to draw portraits in courtrooms.

There are many different methods creators use to make illustrations. Some artists work for media companies or do their own freelance illustrations.

Illustrators work is usually based on commissions by companies or private bodies. There are agencies you can work in, publishing companies for children’s books for example, or you can also produce editorial or authorial illustrations for magazines or posters.

Multimedia Artists and Animators

Multimedia artists and animators create films, video games or other special effects for specific companies.

They may specialize in just one aspect of the production process, such as creating only special effects for movies or designing background graphics.

Some multimedia artists and animators do their work by hand, sketching characters on paper with a pencil; while others use only digital tools to create something like fully digital NFT artworks. These artists are usually hired to work for companies, however, most creatives in this do freelance work.

Fine Artists

Now, the most “prestigious” one: Fine Art. Fine artists are often known for producing realistic depictions of people or objects. They usually specialize in paintings, sculptures or prints. These artists work with traditional materials like graphite, ink or acrylic paint; they may also use clay, stone or other classic materials too.

Fine artists work in all types of settings, including studios and outdoors. Formal training is not a requirement for artists because talent is innate (,- or not, but I’ll discuss that another time), however, and as I mentioned before, many artists do still prefer formal training to sharpen their skills.

Artists may sell their work privately, offer it through an exhibition gallery, or work for an organization that owns the rights to their artwork.

Most fine artists are self-employed by trade. Though many have other jobs on the side as well, it’s more common to see fine artists practising full time rather than other artists.

Salaries and Prospects

Artist’s Anual Income

The BLS does not break down data on wages earned solely through the sale of artwork. Still, according to their data, back in 2018, the average annual wage for fine artists is $53,400.

On the other hand, traditional and fine artists earned around 10% of a salary of $32,210. This means that 90% earned more than this amount. So, if 90% of the artist’s salary is $70,210, this can only mean that 10% of these artists earn more. In 2018, almost 60,000 individuals were employed in the fine art/ craft artist sector.

Economic Prospects

The state of the economy affects a fine artist’s ability to find work and earn enough money for basic living expenses. In an economic downturn, it is more difficult for artists to sell their work because buying art is optional.

The BLS predicted that the number of jobs available for artists would grow slower than average, with a growth of almost 10% from 2010-2020… But we were not expecting a sudden global pandemic… So now things are a little bit different, and if numbers were low before, right now they are at their ultimate low.

So here’s my advice to you considering the tough times we’re all going through; As a professional in this industry, if you want to make it as an artist and support yourself through your work, you need to balance a parallel job… Trust me, it might take a while until everything’s back on track again.

Disadvantages of being an Artist

Right, so we’ve discussed some of the most important options, prospects and requirements to consider before jumping in on the decision of becoming an artist and making a living from it.

Few artists are lucky enough to be born with natural talent that can lead them to a stable career and reliable source of income. But unfortunately, many artists spend years continuing their education or perfecting their skills only to find themselves searching for a steady paycheck from a different source of income.

Making a living as an artist is more about passion than it is about the benefits. And here is why:

Unpredictable Income

The popular term “starving artist” became coined because most artists can’t support themselves through art alone.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports showed that only the most successful artists are able to live on their artwork. Back in 2010, you would only be considered an artist if your salary was less than $9.10 an hour and if you had at least one other job. Thankfully tho, now it’s advisable that you take on other side jobs, it helps you gain experience.

Inconsistent Scheduling

Artists looking to make a living off of selling their art often have to work very hard. They must take time out of showcasing their art in galleries, visiting museums to show their work, or working from home.

Multimedia artists who similarly work from home also need to put in about 50 hours per week and maintain creative and dependable reputations.

Lack of Support

Artist employment is largely impacted by the amount of charity that goes to the arts. Although charitable donations are declining, and while interest in this occupation has persisted and led to a larger window of qualified candidates, income levels have decreased.

This will lead to a continuous battle for prospective employees trying to get sponsorship grants or gallery display privileges after this year of economic recess.

General Downsides

Making a living out of this notable profession can definitely be challenging, it’s important to not lose focus. If you want to become successful in this field, you’ve got to be ready to face a lot of obstacles.

Learning to be a professional artist is about gaining natural talent that can be transformed into profit. For those who already make a living as an artist, it’s necessary to keep improving their skills each time in order to maintain their place in the industry.

The exposure to materials required for the job can potentially have harmful impacts as well. The BLS notes that although most studios are properly ventilated, artists should be careful about their daily exposure to paint and ink fumes which is a concern to have.

Always have a plan B or a side job with a more consistent pay that can both benefit you financially and in terms of acquiring skillsets that you can later use on your creative process. You’ve got to be prepared to accept badly paying jobs too, to gain visibility and exposure.

Conclusion

• Arts and the Cultural Sector can have a great economic impact via expenditures and receipts from various activities. It’s a very profitable growing industry that attracts millions and can be linked to the Entertainment Industry, Technology and Tourism.
• To make a living as an artisit, its not obligatory but getting a Bachelor of Fine Arts (BFA) or Master of Fine Arts (MFA) degree from an art school that is accredited by the National Association on Schools of Art and Design, can be considered essencial.
• Artists income can increase with each level of experience. Exposure and a diverse set of skills and settings make the artist more desirable and interesting to potential clients.
• ine arts, crafts, digital art, illustration and multimedia to name a few vocations. They’re all different types of visual arts, – ones more prestigious than others, but they’re all subcategories that fall under the Artist umbrella.
• Most fine artists are self-employed by trade. Though many have other jobs on the side as well, it’s more common to see fine artists practising full time rather than other artists.
• According to BSL data, the average annual wage for fine artists is $53,400.
• Making a living as an artist is more about passion than it is about the benefits.
• Making a living out of this notable profession can definitely be challenging, it’s important to not lose focus. If you want to become successful in this field, you’ve got to be ready to face a lot of obstacles.

Digital Art vs Traditional Art: Which one Is Better?

The Digital Art vs Traditional Art debate has been ongoing for quite some time now… Ever since the introduction of digital platforms and mediums, art has adapted and adopted many different forms throughout the years in order to fit the ever so changing times.

Digital artists have always stood by their work, claiming that digital art is every bit as “real” as traditional works. Traditional artists, on the other hand, consider digital art a form of “cheating”, “fast and easy art”, and “fake”. Some might even say that digital creators don’t make enough effort to be considered real artists.

It’s a controversial topic with no clear answer yet… However, for every valid argument that supports traditional art over anything else, digital art is the industry’s preferred medium for commercial products and here is where the line gets blurry…

Is Digital Art Actually Easier?

Some people in the art community see technology as a threat to originality and are concerned that it will replace traditional artmaking. This idea can certainly be worrisome for some artists and art institutions like museums and galleries who rely heavily on traditional works.

Of course, not all artists have the same opinion on the subject. Some traditional artists are receptive towards digital art. Others see digital art as: “Computer, draw me a person,” and a portrait suddenly appears on their computer screen. This is certainly not how digital artists work most of the time…

Digital art can be easier sometimes,(- and I will list you the pros and cons later on) but it’s not easier from the knowledge and actual skills perspective. Digital artists must understand drawing and painting fundamentals, composition, techniques, colouring, etc.. and those are only a few skills that come from knowledge and experience and absolutely no software is a replacement for any of those criteria.

So it is definitely not true. Digital Art isn’t necessarily easier, because some artists can take longer amounts of time and effort working with different softwares and mediums than those who only work with traditional mediums.

Is Traditional Art Dying?

The question has been asked a lot especially recently with all the NFTs hype going on. But my answer is that traditional art is not dying and it probably will take decades for that to ever happen.

It is true that while the traditional commercial industry medium is physical art, a large part of it has turned to digital media. Still, galleries, museums and auctions houses still see a lot of value and profit in traditional works.

Many people want a “real” painting on their walls. And it is in fact, a different experience that digital art can’t quite recreate yet.

Just like traditional artists, digital artists employ the same kind of skills but just with different tools. Using a computer to draw does not lessen the effort involved in creating art; it is simply done in a different manner from what many are used to.

Traditional vs Digital

Both digital and traditional art are similar in many ways, but also very different. To compare the two more closely, here is what each has to offer:

Traditional Art Pros

Traditional art is defined as any artwork made using physical media.

Skills
Obviously, it’s not just for traditional artmaking that you need a good set of skills. But it’s where you start. In order to to succeed in any art form you need to learn the basis of art-making which begins in a traditional setting.

Colour theories, composition, drawing styles, graphic and stylistic expressions, techniques, experimentation with materials, textures, brushes, pencils and so on, you only get to understand and gain the fundamental knowledge a posteriori.

Imperfections
Traditional art’s uniqueness is one of its most cherished benefits. Sure, you can scan the artwork and modify an existing copy as your own, but then it’s no longer considered an original piece.

Moreover, those imperfections and unintended strokes are what make traditional art so beautiful and individualistic – they give each piece a sense of exclusivity almost.

Practicality
Creating traditional art doesn’t depend on technology. If you don’t have a connection or internet access, you can keep working…

Senses
Traditional artwork comes with a different type of beauty that can’t be reproduced digitally. It is touchable, it has textures and unique colour mixing that we can’t enjoy as much over a computer screen.

Traditional Art Cons

Lighting
A traditional artist’s work as a physical object requires light. If an artist were to paint in the middle of the day, their work will be noticeably different at night because of how light changes.

Medium Limitations
Although you are working with the actual medium, all of them come with limitations on what they can do: such as how one material interacts with another or limited color options, impossible blending nad running out of supplies

Permanence
Traditional methods are typically unforgiving. There is no “undo” feature, and the line you put in can’t be made unpermanent.

Messiness
Working with traditional medium can be inconvenient and messy, requiring long hours of cleaning up, washing, putting things away and setting up and preparing all the materials one might need to start making an artwork.

Digital Art Pros

Digital art refers to the creations of artists who utilize technology in their work. Unlike traditional arts and crafts, digital artwork is typically created on a computer using various software programs.

Adaptability
Digital art does not have any limitations in what your finished work can look like. You could use a regular brush, or even watercolour brushes inside of an art program, and still be able to go back and change things from the original drawing.

Flexible Resources and Tools
Some artists feel like using these is cheating in a way. But do you think if a traditional artist could make use of them, they wouldn’t? You can flip a canvas, resize it, rotate it, shape elements, copy and paste things, smudge, adjust colours, and so much more…

Cheaper
Although it may seem that traditional art supplies are cheaper, they aren’t in the long run. Whenever you purchase an art supply that runs out quickly, you will have to keep making more purchases. That money really adds up! With a digital tablet, it won’t matter how much your work progresses because of its longevity and there is no need to constantly spend money on more materials.

Safer
There are many ways to protect your digital files on a computer, including copying them to an external hard drive, sending the file by email, and storing it in an online hosting site like Dropbox. However you choose to store and protect your digital works, remember that anything can happen: rain, dirt or greasy fingers can ruin the project you poured hours into.

Digital Art Cons

Laziness
The ability to undo mistakes, something that traditional artists have never been able to do, has changed how digital artists apply their medium. That can mean that the artwork is not the best version of itself.

Aesthetics
Some people like the “digital” look of digital art. Others think all digital drawings are boring and lifeless.

Unoriginality
In traditional paintings, the original work is typically worth thousands and millions of dollars. However, there are usually limited copies—prints costing $10-$200. With digital art as its is easier to reproduce, it becomes a point of contention whether digital art is real and valuable or not.

Printing
Although the digital art you have on your computer may look great, it will not resemble what you get when it is printed.

Can they be Interchangeable?

In addition to those who exclusively use digital mediums, many artists also blend the two approaches as their art practices. It’s actually very common to use digital tools in the making of a physical object.

Some professionals in the industry do not disdain digital tools, rather they prefer traditional methods like oil painting or sculpture which both take a great degree of time and practice.

Yet, physical art should never invalidate digital work that can serve as a tool to prepare pieces that have a traditional finishing. Digital softwares can complement traditional works by helping artists be more precise and rigorous with designing and sketching out an artwork.

Who Wins?

While it is true that digital art can allow certain features to be completed much quickly and easily, (- for example, a gradient in traditional art may take more than half an hour to create compared to the minute or two on most digital drawing softwares) it doesn’t mean that the work takes any less time nor does it negate its inherent value.

Sometimes digital art is seen as “less than” other forms of art, but in the end, there are more career opportunities for those who work with digital media.

In response to what has been said thus far, these 2 mediums serve as different yet the same. No one should put one or the other into a category of “better” art.

Ultimately, we need to look at the work that artists are trying to convey and how they executed it rather than whether it was drawn digitally or traditionally.

Conclusion

• Some digital artists claim that digital art is every bit as “real” as traditional works.
• Some traditional artists consider digital art a form of “cheating”.
• Some people in the art community see technology as a threat to originality and are concerned that it will replace traditional artmaking. This idea can certainly be worrisome for some artists and art institutions like museums and galleries who rely heavily on traditional works.
• Galleries, museums and auctions houses still see a lot of value and profit in traditional works. Many people want a “real” painting on their walls. And it is in fact, a different experience that digital art can’t quite recreate yet.
• Digital Art isn’t necessarily easier, because some artists can take longer amounts of time and effort working with different softwares and mediums than those who only work with traditional mediums.
• Digital softwares can compliment traditional works by helping artists be more precise and rigouros with designing and sketching out an artwork.
• Traditional Art will not be replaced by Digital Art.
• It’s important to look at the work that artists are trying to convey and how they executed it rather than whether it was drawn digitally or traditionally.

Is Art Truly Subjective? The Debate Goes On…

We all have our own culture, values, and opinions that undeniably end up defining and influencing our taste and preferences on different subjects. Art is without a doubt subjective… Right? At least it’s what we’re told. But, honestly, if art is so subjective why were some white canvas chosen to be displayed in the biggest museums in the world and others aren’t? Who decides and defines good art vs bad art? Are famous artists more skilled than the average one?

Perhaps if my favourite colour is black but yours is blue, it doesn’t make my preference any better than yours, because it’s only a personal preference. However, if I say that Basquiat is the best artist in the world but you say it is Warhol, there’s enough records and documentation that prove that Da Vinci might be classified as the greatest of all time.

Art always brings up a lot of conflicting opinions. Nothing is that black and white, and specifically when we talk about art. The value we give to art can definitely be subjective.

There are a lot of circumstances that go into our perceptions of whether art is good or not. So, without further a due, let’s dive into a few of them.

Subjectivity… To some extent

Art is subjective because we see things and interpret what we see differently than one another. Consequently, popular opinion can be highly manipulated by the amount of fame of one particular artist, the amount of mediatic exposure and recognition, and the social trends going on when following the latest events in the art world. It’s inevitable, opinions will change over time and so can our perception of art.

Even if we consider the appreciation of an artwork relative, if an artist wants to be featured in a museum, the process is quite objective:

– Recognition; the artist must have participated in tons of exhibitions, nationally and internationally. Without exhibitions, there’s no recognition and without recognition, there’s virtually no interest in displaying works of artists that haven’t been exhibited anywhere.

– The artist’s works have to ignite the interest of collectors besides the general public. The artworks cultural, social and political context needs to be relevant and appropriate, otherwise, there’s no public nor private investment.

Lastly, the artists must have a certain level of media coverage surrounding them. Without it, there’s also no recognition and without recognition, – again, there’s no interest in their work…

Why Subjectivity is Good in Art

Ok, so for example, at Mariana Custodio we only focus on contemporary art and even inside contemporary art we focus more on abstract expressionism than on figurative expressionism, still that doesn’t mean that figurative art is bad or less worthy, that is only our personal preference. The fact that we all appreciate art in different ways is what gives artists the freedom to create whatever they feel called to create. 

How awful would it be if we decided that there’s only one type of art? We wouldn’t have so many amazing styles or nor creative movements. The fact that we can all unanimously decide what types of art we like allows room for many more art styles to coexist, giving us the opportunity to learn about what we like and what we identify the most with.

Liking Something vs It Being Good

Just because I enjoy looking at a painting doesn’t mean that I think that its aesthetic and technical quality is good. I can enjoy a lot of books but, – again it does not mean that I like them all or that I think the quality of each one of them is great. The same applies to music, movies, fashion and of course art.

When a work of art isn’t judged by experts, where are can we assess objective criteria that tell us whether art is good or bad? I don’t know if you’ve experienced the same but I’ve never gone into a gallery to find a selection with all of the criteria and the necessary requirements for an artwork to be considered good. Some will say that the fact that it’s in a gallery to begin with, is the ultimate evidence that it’s good… However, we’ve all seen some questionable works in galleries… In this way, subjective responses bleed into the “objective” state of things. So we can’t exactly rely on institutions to be in charge of evaluating and deciding what is art and whether it’s good.

So, when we don’t have objective standards to use when we form our opinions of art, how do we decide what is good art?

How Do We Decide What is Good Art

We are constantly shown different opinions, perspectives, criticisms, and more. We are constantly challenged to defend our points of view and to stand up for causes we believe in. We are continually discovering new artists and deciding what we value in the art world.

It’s particularly difficult to unanimously and universally come to a decision about art when everyone has a different opinion about it… If everything we like, hate or feel indifferent about has been shaped by our life experiences, it’s nearly impossible to weed out everything that could have influenced the reasons why we like a piece of art and simply look at it objectively. So, should we worry that subjective opinion is influenced by the world we live in? Wouldn’t this mean that we’re forming opinions with a very particular perspective on our own experiences? The answer is yes…!

We put a lot of value in trying out new things, seeing the world, and meeting new people. And those are the first steps that will get us closer to deciding whether an artwork is good or bad. This is a very democratic process, opinions on subjective matters are formed when we take a look around, when we compare, analyse and experience different scenarios. What you experienced in the past and what you choose to expose yourself to now plays a great role in the way we, as a community, seek out art and form opinions about it. If we don’t see enough, we might not have enough information to make valid and informed opinions…

Popularity Influences our Opinion About Art

Artists with more visibility are usually the ones that make the most impact. Therefore, when something becomes popular, it usually increases in likability. A lot of that comes from the amount of exposure they already have. When something becomes popular, it gets people talking. Given technology these days, this can really favour artists that understand how to use social media…

Right, so naturally, a specific artwork is more attractive when people know it exists. You can’t like something or decide the aesthetic value of a piece when you don’t know exists. Once visibility spreads and something becomes popular and mainstream, people will simply gravitate towards it. Without questions to ask, it’s easier to accept what comes to us, we tend to agree more on what is easier to hear or is more convenient at the time. It’s very common to believe we like a piece of art more than we do just so that we can have a deeper communal connection to a group.

How Artists Themselves Influence Subjectivity

We often feel a lot of loyalty towards the artists we know and admire. Oftentimes we tend to support them and their work despite actually considering if what they produce is good or bad. We tend to become biased in relation to what we know we already like. We have empathy towards people we admire so we regularly favour them and put them on a pedestal even if we don’t like what they’re making.

So this is definitely another aspect to have in consideration when evaluating art. If an artist already has a following and an established fan base, it’s more likely that the artist’s work is considered good and valid, despite any technicalities their work might have against it.

When thinking about the style art that you like, look to your absolute preferred artist as a hub. What other artists alike come out from that hub? A lot of times you’ll see that your favourite artists sent you down a pathway of discovery with other artists in that style. It’s not a bad thing, but just a way to see how your subjective perspectives can get biased more easily.

The Dilemma

To foreground subjectivity as the most appropriate response to a work of art threatens to overlook the fact that tastes and preferences do in fact change over time, just as morals and public standards change too. Yet, subjective taste has a historical dimension, even if we prefer to think it doesn’t…

In art, we tend to place lot of emphasis on originality and creativity, right? But with the neverending shift in traditions and cultures, there are many examples of artistic “revolutions” that have failed to meet with the tastes of society at the time, only to be subsumed into the conventional appetites of later generations. For example, the Impressionist paintings of Monet and Cezanne. One critic back then complained that both of their paintings were half-finished sketches.

The ways that people look at the world around them — at works of art or anything else — are prone to influence from so many other spheres, from political upheavals to technological advances. What counts as “knowledge”, “proper behaviour”, “judgement” and “good taste” never stay the same.

Will art ever become an objective subject? Porbably not. In retrospect, no; it’s almost impossible to value an artwork as good and valid forever.

Conclusion

• We cannot help but unconsciously build a criterion for what counts as valuable: for what type of work we think should be shown in galleries, what the art market should treat as valuable, who should win art competitions, and all the other practical ways that some artists’ work rises to the top whilst other artists’ work disappears without a trace.
• At the end of the day, our subjective opinions are built by personal experiences and cultural background.
• The unique thing about Art is about developing our own subjective opinions on why we love specific artists. Without subjectivity, art would lose a lot of what makes it so great in the first place.
• If an artist already has a following and an established fan base, it’s more likely that the artist’s work is considered good and valid, despite any technicalities their work might have against it.
• Artists with more visibility are usually the ones that make the most impact. Therefore, when something becomes popular, it usually increases in likability.